Human Rights Custodial Justice

Monday, November 23, 2009

Dad arrested for DWI with 5-year-old daughter not in car seat (Patchogue, Long Island, New York) Dastardly Dads

Note: Cross posted from [worpress angelfury] A Human Rights Issue-Custodial Justice.

Permalink

Dad arrested for DWI with 5-year-old daughter not in car seat (Patchogue, Long Island, New York)

Dad IVAN LLAGZHA has been busted for driving drunking with his 5-year-daughter--who was not in a car seat either. But he won't be facing a felony charge because Leandra's law--the recently passed NY legislation that makes it a felony to commit DWI with a minor in the car--hasn't taken affect yet. So Daddy will just get hit with a misdemeanor. Better not pull this stunt next month, though.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2009/11/21/2009-11-21_leandras_law_doesnt_apply_in_li_bust_with_kid.html

Leandra's Law doesn't apply in L.I. bust with kid

BY Wil Cruz

DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

Originally Published:Saturday, November 21st 2009, 6:10 PM

Updated: Saturday, November 21st 2009, 6:10 PM

A Long Island man was busted Saturday on charges of driving drunk with his young daughter - but he won't face a felony rap because Leandra's Law hasn't taken effect yet.

Ivan Llagzha, 36, was driving his 1997 Honda wildly in Patchogue when cops pulled him over just after 2:30 a.m.

His 5-year-old daughter Kayla was in the car and was not in a child safety seat.

She was not injured, police said.

Before her father allegedly put her in harm's way, the little girl had survived two brushes with death.

According to a 2004 newspaper article, she was born weighing just a pound and a half.

Then, when she was just 3 months old, she was almost killed by loss of oxygen during an apnea attack.

After Llagzha was arrested, the girl was turned over to her mother.

Llagzha, who lives in Patchogue, was charged with driving while intoxicated and endangering the welfare of a child, both misdemeanors.

He dodged a legal bullet because his arrest came just days after Gov. Paterson signed the anti-DWI Leandra's Law.

The law makes it a felony to drive drunk with a child 15 years or younger - but it doesn't take effect until next month.

It was inspired by the death of Leandra Rosado, 11, who was killed last month when a drunken Bronx mom got behind the wheel with a car full of kids.

wcruz@nydailynews.com

Posted by silverside at 8:42 AM

Labels: drugs/alcohol, DUI/DWI, New York

0 comments:

Dad with "temporary custody" confesses to beating 18-month-old son to death

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] Battered Mothers Rights - A Human Rights Issue.

Permalink

From Dastardly Dads

Dad with "temporary custody" confesses to beating 18-month-old son to death; he did it "because the baby wouldn't stop crying" (New Roads, Louisiana)

Dad AARON BOWMAN, who, for some unspecified reason, was awarded "tempoary custody" of his two young children, has been charged with 1st degree murder of his 18-month-old son. Dad has already confessed to the killing; seems his nose got bent out of joint because the little boy was crying. So Daddy beat him to death, the sick little sh**.

Not a word on the moronic officials who gave this creep "temporary custody." Let's see the names and some accountability!

http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/police/70731097.html

New Roads man, 28, arrested in death of his child

By SANDY DAVIS

Advocate staff writer

Published: Nov 22, 2009 - Page: 1B

New Roads police arrested the father of an 18-month-old boy Friday after the toddler was found beaten to death at his grandmother’s house last week, police said Saturday.

Aaron Bowman, 28, of New Roads, was booked into the Pointe Coupee Parish Prison on one count of first-degree murder, said New Roads Police Capt. Mark Munson on Saturday.

Bowman had temporary custody of Aaron Bowman Jr., the toddler, as well as his 2-year-old daughter, Munson said.

The toddler’s grandmother, who was not identified, called police at about 11 a.m. Wednesday, Munson said.

“When we got to her house, the baby was dead,” Munson said.

An autopsy showed that one of the baby’s legs was broken and he had been hit “with the palm of a fist” on his head, his stomach and his back, Munson said.

The child also had liver damage, he said.

“The baby died from internal bleeding,” Munson said.

The autopsy showed that the toddler received the injuries on Tuesday, he said.

Bowman first told police that the child was injured while Bowman was playing with him. Bowman said he was throwing the child in the air when the child “slipped” and fell, Munson said.

“But the injuries on the baby were not consistent with an accident like Mr. Bowman described,” Munson said. “His story was not consistent with the pathologist’s findings.”

Three police officers, Munson, Sgt. Shell Stringer, and Chief Kevin McDonald, questioned Bowman on Friday until he confessed, Munson said.

“He said he did it because the baby wouldn’t stop crying,” Munson said.

Technorati Tags: custody,death,From,Dads,Roads,Louisiana,AARON,BOWMAN,children,degree,Daddy,word,news,SANDY,DAVIS,Advocate,writer,Page,father,toddler,Pointe,Coupee,Parish,Prison,Police,Capt,Mark,Munson,daughter,accident,findings,Three,Shell,Stringer,Chief,Kevin,McDonald,injuries,officers,month,wouldn,grandmother,autopsyNote: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] Battered Mothers Rights - A Human Rights Issue.

Permalink

Child support idiocy and father's rights activists

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] Battered Mothers Rights - A Human Rights Issue.

Permalink

Child support idiocy and father's rights activists By Glenn’s’Cult

http://glennscult.blogspot.com

Well the two go hand in hand let me tell you. First check out what the guy is saying (not highlighted portions). Petunia Commentary to follow...

Laryy Broyer (ldbroy2001@yahoo.com) says:

I'm curious if anybody has sued thier EX for making false

statements, regarding support payments. My Ex is playing games,

Gonna have to hire a lawyer etc. etc. I've been through so much

crap with this women, and her sneaky underhanded actions, continue

to surprise me.

I've got lock solid proof her accounting practices are far from

reality. There has to be away to teach her a lesson, to never again

temped to manipulate the system for personal gain.

I'm old now, and really just don't want the added stress of dealing

with this stuff anymore. 28 years of constant attacks is enough.

Gonna hire a lawyer, and be done with it. Can't afford it, but

what else can I do. All those years of stress, have taken thier toll.

Recently the company I was working for closed. They always seem to hit

you when your most vulnerable. Then thiers my son, he doesn't need this crap either, can I sue on both of our behalfs.

Larry Broyer

Well doing the math would love for you to point out to me why you have been dealing with this for TWENTY EIGHT (28) years? The longest period of time to be paiyng child support is generally 18-22 years (if you must continue through college). generally though it is 18 years of age. So an extra 10 years on top? Maybe, just maybe Lumpen Larry, it is because you did not pay what you were supposed to pay and she got a judgment for interest. Now you will be paying this for a very long time. Should have saved your self some money and aggravation. A bank would have been cheaper from which to borrow than the state.

Do we have to spell it out for these guys?

Posted by Glenn's Cult?at 6:04 PM

Labels: Child Support, Larry Broyer, ldbroy2001 at yahoo.com

2 comments:

larry said...

OK Mister mathematician, ever think the children ages range father then 12 years apart, please put your head back in the sand, see you on the food lines in a few years.

November 22, 2009 7:43 PM

Glenn's Cult? said...

Okay mr larry of the hidden blogger profile (what are you afraid of), have you ever done the math yourself? The only way for you to have any more than 18 years of child support total (or 21 depending on the laws of your state) is if you went back to your ex wife (the one you say is so awful) after your older child aged out. If you had a 17 year old and a newborn, max you would pay would be 18-21 years. Not the 28 like you are saying.

So let me explain this so someone who is not a mathematician can understand it.

You have a child who is say 12, and then you have another child and get divorced as soon as said child is conceived. You would pay support in some states for 18 years (19 if you seperate right when woman discovers pregnancy). So you would pay cs for two children for 6 years (oldest one ages out at 18). You will then have another 12-13 years for the next child until they age out. So that is a total of 18-19 years (which is the actual age of the youngest child). The ONLY way for you to have to pay more than that is if you divorced mom and had a 1 year old, then when that child was 11 you and ex got back together conceived another child and she left you again (or you left her). Then you would have already paid for 10 years and would have another 18 years to go to make it 28. But then YOU GOT BACK WITH HER. So that was YOUR CHOICE!!!

There is no other way unless (and this is the likely scenario) you fell behind in your support payments. Then you would be paying arrears and interest.

I foresee that as the likely scenario because with all the venom you spew towards your ex, I do not picture you getting back together with her for a little rendevouz. Why do I say this? because you are on a father's rights email group. And men who are FR's HATE their ex wives. And unless you are just a sex crazed fool, I cannot see you getting back with your ex wife for sex.

So there you have it. Why don't you explain how it came about that you have been paying child support for 28 years?

November 23, 2009 12:00 AM

Technorati Tags: Child,idiocy,father,rights,Glenn,Cult,Petunia,Commentary,Laryy,Broyer,payments,Gonna,lawyer,actions,lesson,system,Larry,math,period,college,Maybe,Lumpen,judgment,Should,self,money,aggravation,Support,comments,Mister,children,food,November,Okay,wife,newborn,woman,BACK,CHOICE,scenario,arrears,venom,HATE,portions,statements,yahoo,thier,crap,mathematician

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] Battered Mothers Rights - A Human Rights Issue.

Permalink

Canadian Blogger Attempts to Shift Focus from Father's Rights Hate Incitement

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] I will not SHUT UP , GIVE UP and I WONT go away!!.

Permalink

Monday by Randi James

Canadian Blogger Attempts to Shift Focus from Father's Rights Hate Incitement

In a classic attempt to shift the focus, a Canadian father's rights blogger, Mike Murphy, "outs" a website called MISS because:

They use the information leeched from other blogs and web pages...to publish libelous material that has criminal overtones.

The MISS website utilizes information publicly posted on the internet to compile "biographies" about the most vocal players in the father's rights movement. Yet, instead of soliciting his audience to question the information that is presented, Mike Murphy uses personal attacks and distortion to rouse his followers:

The fringe lunatic group called anonymums are up to their old games again with a new hate site but they are now going beyond the bounds of their other dim bulb men's hate sites and into the realm of criminal hate and civil libel.

The oldest trick in the book is to call into question the mental status of a woman (since he can't use the "she's a slut" tactic). In this way she cannot be seen as valid opponent because the attention has been deflected from information that is indeed factual:

It is my belief the person doing this may be suffering from a serious personality disorder and it is of concern...This is, I believe, a female who belongs to a group on the lunatic fringe of mothers who have lost custody of their children and some of whom have serious personality disorders based on the hate sites against men they operate.

Has he attempted to verify or dispute the accuracy of the information?:

Please note one of the people this woman has slandered is an American Judge and I will forward my information to him in case he wishes to have the FBI investigate.

Upon a simple Google search, it becomes evident that none of this information is slander when it originates from documents not created by the website's authors.
Mike Murphy also attempts to silence the MISS site:

I have sent the following off to the Australian Federal Police, the ISP of the cyber stalker from Melbourne in OZ, shown below and will follow up with a legal letter to Wordpress the owners of the blogs.

This is not new. Mike Murphy does have a history of publishing what he believes to be his opponent's IP addresses and other sensitive information. Coincidentally, he has also done the similar things to his ex-wife--information which also can be found throughout the internet, courtesy of him. The only thing that has been found to be criminal, are the actual actions of Mike Murphy and the others listed on the MISS website.
If Mike Murphy is successful in his quest, we must wonder--if our own actions can constitute libel, if someone else puts it on display, then how will there ever be any transparency or consequences for unethical behaviors?
What kind of politics is this?
See Also: Press release: Global media monitoring project

Technorati Tags: Canadian,Blogger,Shift,Focus,Father,Rights,Hate,Incitement,Mike,Murphy,MISS,players,movement,audience,distortion,followers,bulb,realm,status,woman,tactic,opponent,attention,belief,person,disorder,custody,children,accuracy,American,Judge,wishes,Upon,Google,documents,Australian,Federal,Police,stalker,Melbourne,letter,history,wife,courtesy,actions,transparency,consequences,politics,Also,Global,disorders,authors,owners,website,blogs,internet

Canadian,Blogger,Shift,Focus,Father,Rights,Hate,Incitement,Randi,James,Mike,Murphy,MISS,players,movement,audience,distortion,followers,bulb,realm,status,woman,tactic,opponent,attention,belief,person,disorder,custody,children,accuracy,American,Judge,wishes,Upon,Google,documents,Australian,Federal,Police,stalker,Melbourne,letter,history,wife,courtesy,actions,transparency,consequences,politics,Also,Global,Technorati,disorders,authors,owners,website,blogs,internet
Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] I will not SHUT UP , GIVE UP and I WONT go away!!.

Permalink

Sunday, November 22, 2009

Dossier: Warren Farrell: MISS MOTHERS INTELLIGENCE SECRET SERVICE

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] I will not SHUT UP , GIVE UP and I WONT go away!!.

Permalink

http://mothersintelligencesecretservice.wordpress.com/2009/11/22/dossier-warren-farrell/

Dossier: Warren Farrell

Posted on November 22, 2009 by mothersintelligencesecretservice

Warren Farrell is an icon for radical mens cells as Osama bin laden is for the violent Jihad movement. References from his books can bee seen on nearly every radical mens cell in the world. In his book The Myth of Male Power, he distorts the perception of women as though they are an object to exploit and despise of if they do not submit to every demand. His literature has become the precipice of rage towards government and the erosion of basic human rights of women and children at their mercy. One of the most alarming aspects of this leader, is his promotion of incest and rape:

In penthouse magazine interview, he referred to incest as though it were a positive experience for all family members concerned:

In an article called Jihad and rape go hand in hand, the words are different, but the intent is the same:

One of the quotes of Warren Farrell, compares womens rights as though they are the war instigators:

The Al Qaeda had a similar message when France made a law against burkas to stop the subjecting of women:

In both statements, it was made out to be that those who try to promote the rights of women are the ones who are terrorists.

1 Votes

Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)

Introducing MISS

Filed under: Mothers Rights | Tagged: Al Queda, Berkas, Child Sexual Abuse, Childrens RIghts Council, Dangerous, Date Rape, Divorce, Domestic Extremists, Family, Fatherhood, Fathers Rights Movement, Feminism, France, Incest: The Last Taboo, Jihad, Mens Cell, Osama bin Laden,Parent Alienation Canada, Penthouse, Radical Islam, Rape, Terrorism, Terrorists, The Myth Of Male Power, Violence Against Women, Warren Farrell

« Dossier: Mike J Murphy

Technorati Tags: dossier,warren,Farrell,November,icon,Osama,Jihad,movement,cell,world,Myth,Male,Power,perception,literature,precipice,government,erosion,human,rights,children,mercy,leader,promotion,magazine,article,words,quotes,Qaeda,message,France,MISS,Queda,Berkas,Child,Sexual,Abuse,Childrens,Council,Dangerous,Date,Rape,Divorce,Domestic,Feminism,Incest,Last,Taboo,Mens,Laden,Parent,Alienation,Canada,Penthouse,Radical,Islam,Terrorism,Terrorists,Violence,Against,Women,Mike,Murphy,cells,References,aspects,members,statements,Extremists,Fathers,mothersintelligencesecretserviceNote: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] I will not SHUT UP , GIVE UP and I WONT go away!!.

Permalink

Dossier: Mike J Murphy: MISS: Mothers Intelligence Secret Service

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] I will not SHUT UP , GIVE UP and I WONT go away!!.

Permalink

Dossier: Mike J Murphy

http://mothersintelligencesecretservice.wordpress.com/2009/11/22/dossier-mike-j-murphy/

Posted on November 22, 2009 by mothersintelligencesecretservice

Mike Murphy describes himself as an activist for fathers4justice. He is also a follower of the pro-pedophile philosophy created by DR Richard Gardner. His views have beencompared to those of NAMBLA(North American Man – Boy Love Association) and rejected by the scientific community. Despite Murphys claims that there is no evidence he abused his children, he makes a bizarre statement that he believes that he is an abuser:

His intentions clearly go well beyond the realm of activism:

And This:

Technorati Tags: Dossier,Mike,Murphy,MISS,Intelligence,Secret,Service,November,follower,philosophy,Richard,Gardner,NAMBLA,North,American,Love,Association,Despite,Murphys,children,statement,abuser,realm,intentions,mothersintelligencesecretserviceNote: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] I will not SHUT UP , GIVE UP and I WONT go away!!.

Permalink

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution (an overview)

Note: Cross posted from [wp ridezstormz] Silent No More!.

Permalink

first amendment: an overview

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression from government interference. See U.S. Const. amend. I. Freedom of expression consists of the rights to freedom of speech, press, assembly and to petition the government for a redress of grievances, and the implied rights of association and belief. The Supreme Court interprets the extent of the protection afforded to these rights. The First Amendment has been interpreted by the Court as applying to the entire federal government even though it is only expressly applicable to Congress. Furthermore, the Court has interpreted, the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as protecting the rights in theFirst Amendment from interference by state governments. See U.S. Const. amend. XIV.

Two clauses in the First Amendment guarantee freedom of religion. The establishment clause prohibits the government from passing legislation to establish an official religion or preferring one religion over another. It enforces the "separation of church and state." Some governmental activity related to religion has been declared constitutional by the Supreme Court. For example, providing bus transportation for parochial school students and the enforcement of "blue laws" is not prohibited. The free exercise clause prohibits the government, in most instances, from interfering with a person's practice of their religion.

The most basic component of freedom of expression is the right of freedom of speech. The right to freedom of speech allows individuals to express themselves without interference or constraint by the government. The Supreme Court requires the government to provide substantial justification for the interference with the right of free speech where it attempts to regulate the content of the speech. A less stringent test is applied for content-neutral legislation. The Supreme Court has also recognized that the government may prohibit some speech that may cause a breach of the peace or cause violence. For more on unprotected and less protected categories of speech see advocacy of illegal action, fighting words, commercial speech andobscenity. The right to free speech includes other mediums of expression that communicate a message. The level of protection speech receives also depends on the forum in which it takes place.

Despite popular misunderstanding the right to freedom of the press guaranteed by the first amendment is not very different from the right to freedom of speech. It allows an individual to express themselves through publication and dissemination. It is part of the constitutional protection of freedom of expression. It does not afford members of the media any special rights or privileges not afforded to citizens in general.

The right to assemble allows people to gather for peaceful and lawful purposes. Implicit within this right is the right to association and belief. The Supreme Court has expressly recognized that a right to freedom of association and belief is implicit in the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments. This implicit right is limited to the right to associate for First Amendment purposes. It does not include a right of social association. The government may prohibit people from knowingly associating in groups that engage and promote illegal activities. The right to associate also prohibits the government from requiring a group to register or disclose its members or from denying government benefits on the basis of an individual's current or past membership in a particular group. There are exceptions to this rule where the Court finds that governmental interests in disclosure/registration outweigh interference with first amendment rights. The government may also, generally, not compel individuals to express themselves, hold certain beliefs, or belong to particular associations or groups.

The right to petition the government for a redress of grievances guarantees people the right to ask the government to provide relief for a wrong through the courts (litigation) or other governmental action. It works with the right of assembly by allowing people to join together and seek change from the government.

Technorati Tags: Amendment,Constitution,overview,freedom,religion,government,interference,Const,rights,speech,belief,Supreme,Court,extent,protection,clause,Fourteenth,establishment,separation,church,Some,example,transportation,person,component,individuals,constraint,justification,peace,violence,advocacy,action,words,message,forum,Despite,publication,dissemination,privileges,Implicit,Fifth,activities,benefits,basis,membership,interests,disclosure,registration,beliefs,associations,relief,courts,litigation,grievances,governments,clauses,students,instances,categories,members,purposes,Amendments,legislationNote: Cross posted from [wp ridezstormz] Silent No More!.

Permalink